![list of extreme hardcore gay porn list of extreme hardcore gay porn](https://thumb-v1.xhcdn.com/a/G1fBtB7i5LCydAeJgAwriQ/002/150/751/320x240.4.jpg)
The prehistory of modern pornography is the classical American stag film, also known as blue movies, a body of clandestine short pornographic films produced during the first two-thirds of the 20th century. For example, William Rotsler's 1973 classification subdivided the X rating for erotic films: "The XXX-rating means hard-core, the XX-rating is for simulation, and an X-rating is for comparatively cool films." History A present, distinctions between materials sold openly and those sold covertly have become extremely unclear.įrom the 1970s, the salient distinction was between hardcore pornography and softcore pornography, which may use simulated sex and limits the range and intensity of depictions of sexual activities.
![list of extreme hardcore gay porn list of extreme hardcore gay porn](https://cdnp.kink.com/imagedb/45561/i/h/410/9.jpg)
There is one genre of sexually oriented material which is almost universally sold under-the-counter in the United States: wholly photographic reproductions of actual sexual intercourse graphically depicting vaginal and/or oral penetration. It can be argued that because of the confusion about the meaning of the term, which stems primarily from an undefined legal concept, it would be well to avoid the use of the term altogether. This is, in effect, the definition of hard-core applied in the marketplace. In this Report, the term is used as a synonym for "under-the-counter" or covertly sold materials. Some judges have employed the term "hard-core pornography" as a synonym for "material which can be legally suppressed". This, of course, is not a legal definition. The 1970 report of the President's Commission on Obscenity and Pornography said: Īilers dealing in sexually oriented materials define "hard-core pornography" as "photographic depictions of actual sexual intercourse with camera focus on the genitals and no accompanying text to provide a legal defense". The category of "borderline obscenity" thus became obsolete. Ohio and other cases, the United States Supreme Court ruled that only "hardcore" pornography could be prohibited by obscenity laws, with the rest protected by the First Amendment. But I know it when I see it, and the motion picture involved in this case is not that. I shall not today attempt further to define the kinds of material I understand to be embraced within that shorthand description, and perhaps I could never succeed in intelligibly doing so. And that is all." Most famously, in Jacobellis v. Eberhard and Phyllis Kronhausen in 1959 distinguished "erotic realism" from "pornography" in the latter "the main purpose is to stimulate erotic response in the reader. magazines, cartoons, nudist publications, etc." and "hard core pornography, which no one would suggest had literary merit". United States (1957) the government brief distinguished three classes of sexual material: "novels of apparently serious literary intent" "borderline entertainment. "Borderline pornography" appealed to sexual prurience, but had positive qualities, such as literary or artistic merit, and so was arguably permitted by obscenity laws "hardcore pornography" lacked such merits and was definitely prohibited. A distinction between "hardcore pornography" and "borderline pornography" (or "borderline obscenity") was made in the 1950s and 1960s by American jurists discussing obscenity laws.